Showing posts with label 2d animation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2d animation. Show all posts

Barking Heads - comic strips

2 May 2011






We've been doing some work for organic pet food Barking Heads recently. The company uses a family of pets to represent their product, and they asked us to bring these characters to life through animation and a series of comic strips for their website and magazine adverts.

This project is a lot of fun to work on - although coming up with ideas for the strip has probably lost me a couple of fingernails! I thought I'd show a couple of the strips here, while we're working our little socks off on the animation for youtube.

Tangled - Disney's back!

9 Feb 2011

In all honesty I've been completely dreading Tangled.

When it started production 8 years ago it was called Rapunzel and seemed like Disney were no longer ashamed of their fairy story roots. They had my favourite animator of all time (Glen Keane) in the director's chair and although it was CG, they really seemed to be trying to achieve something different with it.

Fast forward to a few days ago, and I was a nervous wreck of anticipation (ok, that's an exaggeration, but I did go through at least one finger nail). They'd changed the name to 'Tangled', demoted Glen Keane and pushed back the release date about a billion times. It seemed like they weren't sure about the appeal of the film, and that's never a good sign with Disney (Treasure Planet anyone?).

But it's actually a damned good film. It's funny, it's sad, it's beautiful, and it's memorable. It sits with the greats as a classic Disney film. And I don't mean that it's a film made by Disney, 'Tangled' is actually a Disney film.

And I can't give it higher praise than that.

Sure there were a couple of negatives; the music wasn't great, certainly wouldn't stand alone without the film like scores from Aladdin or Lion King; the ending could be considered slightly Beauty and the Beast; and the hair changes length from shot to shot with wild abandon...

But who cares?

Disney's back, and that's the best news I've had in a long time.Tangled review

ASIFA website and BAF 2010 review

22 Nov 2010

Despite only joining Asifa UK last year, we’ve become loyal advocates of the wonderful work that they do to promote the animation industry both here and abroad. As a result we will soon be making their brand new, very shiny website where you can find out the latest animation news, meet other similarly afflicted people, find jobs etc.

Until then, I shall leave you with this article that I wrote for the quarterly magazine 'Dope Sheet' summarizing my top bits of last week’s Bradford Animation Festival, and a recommendation to subscribe to Asifa UK as soon as humanly possible.



"For many of us in the fun filled world of Animation, November means a trip to the curry capital of the North, to be inspired by another healthy dose of innovative filmmaking. And Bradford Animation Festival 2010 did not disappoint. This was another year filled with captivating speakers, breath-taking films and enough animation heroes to make the student delegates salivate in awe.

It’s hard to mention all of my favourite parts of an event that included Gene Dietch and his diminutive wife, Tim Searle’s passionate review of British Animation, a long overdue Lifetime achievement award to Ray Harryhausen and a career choice affirming look at how animation can be used as a therapeutic tool. For me, the standout event in a very enjoyable week was Paul Franklin of Double Negative, who gave us a fascinating insight in to the world of visual effects within Inception and Dark Knight.

One of the things that makes BAF the most popular animation festival in the UK is the quality and number of speakers that they invite from within the animation industry and the peripheries. One example of this was Gary Jackson from Scary Cat studios, who gave an enlightening speech on his work making models for stop motion animation. Turns out that there’s a whole lot more to an armature than balsa wood and twisted wire.

Paul Mendoza of Pixar was informative and charismatic as he spoke about the production pipeline at the famous studio, as well as his influences and career. He then made the somewhat catastrophic mistake of mentioning that Pixar were hiring and was immediately lost under a swarm of student animators, never to be seen again.

Two first-rate programs from Clare Kitson invoked nostalgia and a fair amount of jealousy for the heydays of British animation, when Channel 4 was funding the films that won countless awards and recognition for our Industry from around the world.

As always, BAF showcased an impressive and eclectic collection of shorts, music videos, commercials, features and series’. Screening after screening left me impressed and inspired, both with the technical prowess on display and the rollercoaster of narratives. One moment I was sobbing in to my popcorn at Dustin Grella's “Prayers for Peace”, the next I was giggling like an infant at Alan Shorts “The Fly,” and then I was stunned by the technical wizardry and effects of Patrick Jean’s “Pixel”

The judges (Tim Searle, Clare Kitson and Mette Peters) made a few controversial decisions, causing loud and impassioned arguments directly afterwards as we all debated/ screamed the reasons why our favourite films should have won each category instead. But as no one person seemed to agree on which films should have won the newly named and highly coveted “Osgoods,” most had to grudgingly concede that the judges had done a pretty reasonable job.

Barry Purves, as always, spoke with wit, passion and an intriguingly patterned waistcoat as he delivered the awards. He also treated us to a sneak peek of his latest stop motion epic, which I sense I may need to watch with caution and tissues.

For me, the standout film of the festival was probably “The Little Boy and the Beast” by Johannes Weiland of Germany. Subtle, moving and beautifully poetic, this tale is both funny and sad as it moves towards the plot reveal that you eventually realise you knew all along.

As for the Grand Prix… well like I said, some controversial decisions! It went to Andreas Hykade’s “Love and Theft,” which is fun and bright and mesmerising, but not a lot else (in my humble opinion).


Grand Prix
Love and Theft by Andreas Hykade (whimsical and fun but didn’t create any kind of emotional response)




Special Jury Prize
A Lost and Found Box of Human Sensation by Martin Wallner and Stefan Leuchtenberg (Powerful and beautiful, but keeps the audience at arms length rather than inviting them in.




Audience Award
The Little Boy and The Beast by Johannes Weiland (Stunning film, restrained but powerful)




Professional
Big Bang Big Boom by Blu (An incredible logistical accomplishment, full of energy and ideas)




Student
Prayers for Peace by Dustin Grella (A very moving film with a haunting vocal performance)




Short, Shorts
Pixels by Patrick Jean (A must see film for any child of the eighties or fan of what we now have to call ‘retro’ video games. Technically very strong)




Commercials
Heroes of the UAE by Ben Falk and Josiah Newbolt (Imaginative, well made and full of surprises)




TV series
Heirlooms by Wendy Chandler and Susan Danta (Great concept and well executed. Well done to the Commissioning body too for taking a risk)












Music Videos
The Tom Fun Orchestra: Bottom of the River by Alasdair Brotherston and Jock Mooney (The best of a not hugely inspiring bunch, but still well worth watching for it’s important ecological message)



Films for Children
Monstre Sacré by Jean-Claude Rozec (A wonderful film with a great story and fantastic visuals. Made me want to have kids just to show it to them)"














Bradford Animation Festival

15 Nov 2010

This years BAF has been a hugely enjoyable event, filled with great films, passionate debates and really quite excellent curry. Congratulations yet again to Deb Singleton and the team for putting on an event that showcased the extraordinary abilities, artistic invention and downright surreal imaginations that make up the animation industry.

I’ve been asked to write a festival review for next month’s AsifaUK, so I wont go in to depth here, but will leave you with a few of my favourite films (or, the ones I liked that weren’t too hard to find on youtube).

Hope to see you at next years BAF, and if I do, mine’s an apple and mango J20 (hardcore I know)

The Little Boy and the Beast by Johannes Weiland and Uwe Heidschöetter
Stunning film, manages to be both funny and poignant




Out on the Tiles by Anna Pearson
Hahahahaaaaaa. Joanna Quinn's sense of humour, early Aardman style animation




Stanley Pickle by Victoria Mather
Best bit of pixilation I've seen in many a long year!

Animation Showreel

4 Apr 2010

We are exceptionally pleased and proud to reveal our new showreel! It contains our work over the few years from projects including Title sequences, Music Videos, Short Films, Series pitches, Idents and Commercials, for Clients including Sky and ITV.

How to train your dragon

1 Apr 2010

Dreamwork's new film How to Train Your Dragon has not been on top of my years must see films. The films coming out of the studio (since the original Shrek, which I wont hear a word against!) have been generic, formulaic and, lets be honest here, designed with merchandising very much in mind!

The trailers haven't done a huge amount of improve my opinion of the film (although I have read some very good reviews), but yesterday I came across this concept art which shows where the film came from visually. I've always absolutely loved dragons and fantasy art, and this is no exception. It looks like at one point it was going to be a really dark, moody piece with atmosphere and drama.

I don't want to judge the film before I've even seen it, but comparing this beautiful concept art with the images of the finished film screams to me that someone somewhere took a very wrong turn!!





... and how it turned out. Very happy meal friendly!

Film Review: Princess and the Frog

20 Feb 2010

Most of my feelings about Princess and the Frog were those of relief that at last Disney had returned to what Disney do best (hand drawn animation telling heart-warming stories, preferably with the occasional song thrown in for good measure) and hope that it did well enough at the box office for them to make more.

I hadn’t actually got around to forming any hopes or expectation about the film itself, so was little more than a blank slate, waiting to be enchanted.

I thought the film was very good. The story was fun, the music memorable. The characters were believable and empathetic (I was a blubbering wreck at the end, but a quick look around the cinema made me realise that I was the only person emotionally devastated by the death of a firefly). Spoiler alert by the way. Sorry about that.

I thought the villainous Dr Facilier was particularly good – his movement perfectly captured his personality. Lead Animator Bruce Smith and his team did a great job on creating a character with distinctive movement and a tortured soul that stole every scene he was in.

If I had a gripe (and I do) it would be the over reliance on the supporting characters to the detriment of the development of the main ones. This is something that Pixar do so well – they trust their main characters to carry the story and provoke the necessary laughter and emotion, so they don’t feel Disney’s need to fill the screen with trumpet playing crocodiles or unusually breasted blind women with a penchant for snakes.

Not in the top 20 or so Disney films, but a great starting point on the road to recovery!

The Simpsons celebrates 20 years, and Slurpy talk to BBC radio about the reasons behind their success

18 Jan 2010



In January 1990, The Simpsons left their slot on the Tracy Ullman show and began the first series of what was to become a global phenomenon. Homer, Marge, Bart, Lisa, Maggie and friends have starred in 450 episodes of the show, making it the longest running American sitcom ever AND the longest running American entertainment show, going over 21 series and spawning a movie that made $527 million at the box office, not to mention the merchandise which was reckoned to be worth $750 million in 2008 alone.

The show helped change the perception of animation being only for kids, and paved the way for South Park, Family Guy, King of The Hill and Futurama and all of your other favourite animation shows. Seth McFarlane, creative genius behind Family Guy has said "The Simpsons created an audience for Prime Time animation."

Fascinating Fact: On September 11 2001, Seth McFarlane was supposed to be aboard the plane that flew in to the World Trade Center and killed everyone on board. It was only due to a mix up with his travel agent that Seth missed his flight and was able to give the world Family Guy.

From the very beginning, the show has been multi-generational; enjoyed as much by children who can giggle at Bart's 'eat my shorts' attitude as by adults who can relate to the lazy but good hearted Homer or the long suffering Marge. These are real people, with real issues and real feelings (infact they're creator Matt Groening's real family apparently, he named all of his most famous characters after his own family except Bart!). The Simpsons all have their faults, but they're also a strong family unit who look out for one another and always end up making the right decisions. This is a show that adults can enjoy alongside their young ones, laughing often in completely different places as one set of jokes goes over the first generation's head and tickles the funny bone of the next. This is something we're seeing more and more of in animated films at the moment as Producers try to widen the appeal (and therefore the profitability) of their films - Shrek is a wonderful example of this (the first one is anyway - the only thing that the latter two are wonderful examples of is corporate greed and style over substance in my humble opinion).

BBC Radio Surrey and Sussex (formerly BBC Radio Southern Counties) rang us up on Thursday to ask us our opinion on why The Simpsons has gone the distance and to help them celebrate 20 years of yellow mania. The interview is below.

(It should probably be mentioned that I was quite nervous and somehow managed to say South Park instead of the Simpsons in answer to the very first question! Not a great first answer on National Radio, but the interviewer Danny Pike managed to maintain a very professional attitude and not mention it. Unfortunately my friends and colleagues all did!)


Enjoy!

2D animation versus 3D animation

15 Dec 2009

Around this time of year, we at Slurpy are often sent emails by animation students asking our opinions on various matters for their dissertations. When we have time, and when the sender has asked nicely (why do these people think we're going to waste an hour of our time on their homework if they don't even have the common curtest to say please and thank you?) we answer them to the best of our ability.

And every year we seem to get one asking us whether or not we think the death knell has sounded on 2D animation. Partly because this is a question which I feel incredibly strongly about, and partly because I think it will save me effort this time next year, I have decided to answer one such email here on this blog.

- It's no secret that 3D has become the new medium of choice for animators, but why do you think this is?

3D has allowed smaller studios to make feature length films, because they don't need the same budget or talent pool behind it. This is a never ending cycle, because the more people see that most of the films coming out are 3D, the less inclined they will be to study and learn 2D animation. While this is a good thing in that it was widened the playing field and allowed studios other than Disney, Pixar and Dreamworks to show the world what they can do, it is also an incredibly bad thing because the smaller risk associated with making a 3D film seems to have come with a dearth in quality of storytelling. Less time is being spent in pre-production because it is less expensive to make changes to the film once a scene has been animated.

The current audience generally judges films and games primarily by how 'realistic' they look, and 3d films automatically look more realistic than 2d. It doesn’t help that 2D is always judged by the standards of Disney, and Disney were producing several of their worst films (ie. Atlantis and Home on the Range) at beginning of 3D, and people therefore equated better films with 3D and tired old films with 2D.
I hold out strong hopes that the new Disney film 'The Princess and the Frog' will start to erode this opinion in people's minds, and films will be judged on their own merit, rather than by the medium in which they are made.


- Do you believe that in order to stay relevant, 2D animation must change and evolve? If so, how? If not, why?

I actually believe the opposite. I don’t believe that the medium is as important as the storytelling, and a good story makes for a good film. 2D can evolve all it wants to, but it’s never going to be 3D, so it shouldn’t try. Choose the right medium for the story, and the medium should quickly become irrelevant. Walt Disney was an experimenter, always at the forefront of any new technology, and I know that he would have been very keen to embrace 3D animation (and would probably have managed to do so before anyone else. But Walt Disney is not Walt Disney simply because he was an innovator, his main accomplishments were that of a storyteller, and his constant search for the latest technology was simply to find the best ways of telling his story.

3D has it's purpose, and it's been used to make some wonderful films, but it cannot relate to people in the same way that 2D can, simply because it is too close to replicating life without ever being quite perfect. Disbelief is automatically suspended when people know that they are watching a 2D film, yet a 3D film has to work extra hard to avoid the ‘uncanny valley’ to make people believe their ‘close but not quite perfect’ people, and the part of the brain that is aware of things that aren’t quite right with the model are not enjoying the film that is being told.
Very few of the 3D films that have been made recently would have worked as well in 2D, and very few of the classic 2D films would have been better in 3D. This is because of media specificity - the medium in which a film is made dictates the emotions felt when watching it. For this reason, 2D should stick to what it does best, and 3D should do the same.

- Do you think that children as an audience have changed since the golden age of 2D (Loony Tunes, Disney Classics)?

No, I think it’s mostly the adults that have changed. Adults are more afraid of the violence depicted in cartoons, and don't always have a child's ability to disassociate it from real life.

Cartoons that were made in the 60s, 70s and 80s are still shown regularly on TV, whereas little other content from those decades still has the same appeal. The appeal of classic cartoons doesn’t change with passing generations, and the issues that affect children remain the same.

- Is there a future for traditional 2D animation?

Without a doubt.
It took people a while to notice that 3D films are necessarily better than 2D ones, but the hunger for good films will always be there. Disney’s current slate of 2D productions should reassure large studios that 2D is not a risk so long as it is supported by a strong story.

The Princess and the Frog

I cannot even begin to tell you how excited I am about the new Disney film 'The Princess and the Frog.' Not only is it a return to Disney's roots, it also seems to be an acknowledgment from the studio that they are not ashamed of their target audience. For Princess and the Frog is a fairy story, and what's more, it's an all signing all dancing princess related fairy story in classic Disney style, so if you haven't seen it yet, watch and adore...



For too long now Disney have been trying to break away from the type of films that made them so beloved by audiences all over the world. First it was Atlantis trying to emulate the increasingly popular art form Manga, and then it was Treasure Planet trying to get the teenage boy market. I don't even have a clue what they were trying to do with Home on the Range!

It was such a pity that this run of poor films (and I'm not including Lilo and Stitch in that assessment) coincided with the emergence of 3D, because it led audiences and studio executives to believe that 2D was the past and was no longer relevant to a world in which both films and games and judged primarily on how close to reality they look. So I have all of my fingers and all of my toes crossed that Princess and the Frog is an unashamed return to classic form, and that Disney embraces the loyal audience that it does have, rather than chasing after new ones.

Soccerex 09 Titles - Sky Sports 1

10 Dec 2009

We at Slurpy have just finished working on the title animation sequence for Soccerex 09, which is on Sky Sports 1, Sky Sports 2 and Sky Sports HD over the coming days. The sequence shows a football as it journeys down a pitch past various players before arriving in the goal and transforming in to a globe, which shows Africa where the Soccerex Event took place. The textures of the piece and the colours used also reflect an African palette, because we felt it was important to combine the energy of the sport with the importance of the geographical location.




Our friends suffer greatly for the privilege of knowing us. Some get frequent phone calls asking about different
types of music, others are forced to ensure that we eat and sleep a reasonable amount during tight deadlines, and some (most in fact) are asked to perform bizarre acts in front of a camera.

Let me clarify that. We often need live action footage as a reference for our animation, and this short title sequence was no exception. Several of our friends spent their lunch breaks performing headers and sliding tackles for us to provide the footage for this film. Their dedication and grazed knees are much appreciated.

We hope you like it, let us know what you think!

Summer Time...

31 Aug 2008

4mations 400 badge
It doesn't seem that long ago that we posted the music video and were looking forward to a few days off! August has been a quiet month, very much tying up loose ends, promoting ourselves and straightening out some 'boring' business-type things.

We have finished our 2 short animated pieces for ITV (30 seconds each) on the misrepresentation of youths who wear hoodies. This is not available on our website yet, but is due to be broadcast in October.

Best Day We Ever Had is currently being submitted to various film and animation festivals around the world. One of the schemes we have joined is a new Channel 4 inititive called 4mations which showcases animation talents. Slurpy were one of the first to join, hence the strange cat 'badge' we were given (above)!

Apart from the work, August has seen us audition for Tim Burton's new film 'Alice in Wonderland', vivst the Edinburgh Fringe and do a mini sight-seeing tour of the North East. We thought it worth mentioning a wonderful second-hand bookstore in Alnwick, Northumberland. Barter Books is housed in the old railway station and is the 2nd largest bookstore in the UK. It retains an old railway station atmosphere and there is plenty of space to sit and browse your books. If you are up that way, it is well worth a visit!